Ann Coulter is a Woman

She’s no different than the rest: she doesn’t want to understand why the dish washer doesn’t work – her only job is to raise hell and complain until it does.

https://www.rt.com/usa/453442-trump-wacky-nut-job-coulter/

It’s plainly obvious to anyone that the slow progress on things happening with the border are not for lack of will on Trump’s part, but because he has a downright treasonous opposition party against him (the Communist Democrats) and traitors in his own party who lose political battles on purpose, hence the moniker The Washington Generals.  But alas, don’t try to get Ann Coulter to understand such nuance.  She supported for president a guy who is known for and has touted himself as a legendary deal-maker, even having written a book called the Art of the Deal, and then she calls him an idiot for making or floating deals…

She needs to get back in the kitchen and make a sandwich.  I don’t care who the hell eats it.

 

UK Porn Restriction, Regulation, Taxation

Don’t expect tradcons to come to the rescue on principle.  They’d stop you from jacking off if they could…probably design a chastity belt for men that they couldn’t unlock themselves.

https://www.thesun.co.uk/tech/8565486/porn-uk-ban-unlock-card/

Over at Infowars, they’re calling it a taxation scheme, and I’m sure that’s at least part of it – even “global warming” is a taxation scheme, at its core – but like many things we see coming from Big Government these days, it has wide utility that often involves feeding the yawning mouth of gynocentric whim.

Can you imagine having your personal identity connected to your download of adult images that you intend to jack off to?  In this age of Big Tech being infested with social justice activist and social Marxist vigilantes, with all the moral justification to wage cyber warfare against everything their psychotic college professors programmed them to be against, I think it’s pretty easy to see what could go wrong with that.  It’s a fox-guarded hen house that is the last place you’d want to be.

For this reason, I predict that they aren’t going to get much tax money from that.  Tradcons will be delighted, until the first time they realize that it hasn’t made the fertility numbers budge one iota.  Feminists will be delighted at the thought of something bad happening to unattractive men, although they won’t be fulfilled by any means – like all other grievance classes, the wheel will never stop squeaking because that would stop the grease.  As for men in the UK who use porn?  Get ready for a new life of department store catalogs…and reports of new incel attacks, because we know that there are always going to be two or three guys teetering on the fringe who only need a very small push to end up on the other side of the line.  In a sick and pathetic way, feminists are probably hoping for that, in order to breathe new life into their mass victimhood delusions.

Infowars Steps Up Persecution of Incels

ince

Once again, the organization that prides itself on being the “tip of the spear” on many things, including anti-police state sentiments, is advocating a police state for the one demographic that all of the others hate: guys who lack female validation.

https://www.infowars.com/tinder-turning-men-into-desperate-thirsty-losers/

Apparently, humanity’s renaissance against the New World Order is not for all to share.  Tradcons or liberals, MGTOW or marrieds, religious or atheist, capitalists or socialists, males or female, young or old, rich or poor…no one is inviting rejected men to the party.  Apparently, the curators at Infowars envision a free humanity, but they would still reserve a dystopia for systematically rejected (by females) males.

https://www.infowars.com/tinder-turning-men-into-desperate-thirsty-losers/

Paul Joseph Watson cherry-picks some particularly bad simping from males on Tinder – be they incel, nearcel, trolls or otherwise – and projects it all over all incel males, whether they’re Tinder users or not.  Of course that kind of simping of females is absolutely pathetic and should be ridiculed by everyone, incels and noncels alike – even females ought to call it out for what it is, but of course they never will, because attention is as much neurological currency for a woman as sex is for a man – it’s validation.  Also, Paul ought to try getting off of his Infowars pedestal and seeing what happens when you confront guys for simping directly online – you’ll find that everyone of all stripes will condemn you and (ironically) accuse you of being incel.  Funny how that works, isn’t it?  This is how you know that gynocentricism is driving everything these days, including this very Infowars screed.  We’re seeing rationale and principle being tied into a pretzel these days, and all of the anger, negativity and condemnation always end up pointing right back at incels, regardless of who said or did what.

Persecution, flowing from females, contorting around every vestige of logic and principle, and redirecting back to the same guys they won’t fuck.  That’s how it works in the 21st century.

Don’t kid yourself here.  When Paul Joseph Watson and Alex Jones make content like this, and call for incels to be profiled, it is the most start aberration of the convictions that the whole organization is founded on, and it’s being driven by male dominance instinct.  As soon as female-invalidated males become visible, their morals and ethics turn off with the flip of a biological switch, and they instantly revert back into the schoolyard bullies who got all the chicks, and roughed up the weak, isolated boys who couldn’t defend themselves and the girls despised.  This is how and why they carve out an exception for incels, as the one and only demographic not worthy to live free of tyranny.  Apparently, it’s an instinct that even the higher-thinkers of our species can’t overcome.  A male’s worth is determined by females, now that females are in the driver’s seat of sexual selection, and thus, we’re now devolving into a full torunament species, leaving our pair-bonding aspects behind.  Everyone, including the people who are supposedly on the front lines of the fight against a new dark age of feudalism, welcome this new feminist-driven baboon colony way of living with open arms.  That is how you know that this “new golden age” of nationalism and populism for free-minded people around the world isn’t going to last.  50 years?  Perhaps, but it won’t go the distance.

That last entry, from a guy who claims to have rubbed his dick against a girl on a train (if it was even real) should be investigated, and by the way, is much more likely to have been committed by a bad boy than an incel.  The festering of incel usually manifests itself in other ways, that don’t cross the threshold of sexual misconduct.  Of course, that’s not going to stop PJW from projecting it onto incels, for all of the above reasons.

You know, there is one silver lining though…  Aside from that last post, the other posts, where guys call out females for rejection, stringing-along, boyfriend-bombing and the like, are a good thing to see.  Yes of course they are overreactions, but the fact that they’re happening is a step in the right direction, for two reasons: a). modern females need and deserve to have guys take the gloves off on them, verbally; and b). it is showing the world what this very blog is trying to disseminate about the dysfunctional, broken state of male-female relations nowadays.  Yes, it’s bad behavior, but if I’m being completely circumspect, I’ll applaud it.

Boy… I wonder if Advanced regrets participating in that Shy Boys dox-umentary.  Regardless of how much time has passed, he has still managed to become the non-murdering figurehead of everything society hates about incels.

Single Men, In Politics and Real Life

This is not an endorsement of Cory “Spartacus” Booker, by any means, but there is an article with some worthwhile points on public perception of bachelors in positions of leadership, and the lessons apply to everyday men.  Just pretend it’s about someone better than this moron from New Jersey.

Oh, and hold your nose – they only use the ridculous word “boo” about three times.  Just try to ignore that.

Politico: Is America Ready for a Single President?

During his appearance on the syndicated morning radio show “The Breakfast Club” early this month, the conversation turned to his dating life—“Cory Booker got a boo?” exclaimed a host named Charlamagne—and the man known for glib speeches in Senate hearing rooms got cagey, all of a sudden. “Out of all the issues we talked about,” Booker stammered, “this is the most uncomfortable part of this interview.”

There’s a reason it’s uncomfortable – it’s intended to be.  You’re usually only asked that question by people who already know the answer to be a no.  If they’re really feeling sociopath that day, they’ll follow it up a few seconds later with, “Have you ever had one?”  There is no other way to interpret a question like that: it’s a way of persecuting you, for fun.  It’s a pretty overt statement that they have no respect for your humanity at all.

There is a very good Sandman video on this kind of thing called “MGTOW is the New Gay”.

There is only one way to avoid this (maybe): stonewall in the beginning.  Don’t even let them get their foot in the door.  Don’t tell them your relationship status or history.  Don’t even assume that you can say one thing or another about it, and you can suddenly stonewall when it goes beyond your comfort zone.  The tactic of these “normies” is to start a conversation about it, and then they can glean things from where you throw up the black card and end the conversation.  You know that you’re going to have to put up the black card as some point, because their goal is to ferret out what they see as your major malfunction of human reproduction, so you might as well do it off the bat.  It’s none of their business, and you need to set that boundary right at the start.

Now in Cory Booker’s case, he’s running for president, so probing questions like that go with the territory – fine; but happily married or hooked-up normies have pushed for it to go with the territory of just working a regular job these days, and men who are incel or MGTOW have been conditioned to believe that they owe these people answers, and are accountable to fat, gossipy women in your workplace – it’s a lot like how people are conditioned to believe that when cops as you questions, you have to answer, and that the 5th Amendment (US) only kicks in when you are placed under arrest.  Oh, don’t stonewall..that just makes you look guilty!  That’s the thinking of people who don’t know how fishing expeditions work.  If a cop is asking you questions, you already look guilty; and likewise, if someone is asking you your relationship status, you already look incel.  Without getting all hostile, just set the boundary at the outset, and see how that goes.

Now even if you this, you’ll get hit with a deluge of questions, and one of them is going to be if you’re gay.  Most incels and MGTOWs have been accused of being gay dozens of times, mostly by women.  Well, what can we say?  We have to start somewhere…take them to your personnel or human resources department.  Yeah, it probably won’t go anywhere because you’re a male, and there’s a double-standard…try it anyway.

Like it or not, it’s going to keep coming up. The American public is fascinated by bachelorhood, and also eager to see single men married off—hence our keen interest in the dating habits of British royals, and the umpteen-thousand hours produced of “The Bachelor.” As much as the boundaries and definitions of marriage have changed—and over the course of the nation’s history, they’ve changed dramatically—matrimony is still seen as the normal state of a responsible adult.

And this is why you can rest assured that tradcons are not your allies.  You may have the same political and economic beliefs as they do, but they don’t want you in their club.  It’s like how MGTOW don’t want incels hanging around them – tradcons don’t like single men and will never accept them.  For some, it’s even a religious thing.  Just remember that.

The Founders categorized men into four types, Coontz says. The lowest-regarded was the bachelor, who took care of no one’s needs but his own.

The average member of the modern-day public is even more rabid this way.  Here’s what feminists and tradcons alike see in a single man: a bunch of resources that should be going to a woman, but aren’t.  They see your wallet, and they see an arrow going to a woman.

America’s self-image soon became bound with the idea that families were the building blocks of the nation, and that putting the family first was a moral virtue. “The family is the digesting organ of the body politic,” the popular minister and speaker Henry Ward Beecher said at the time. “The very way to feed the community is to feed the family.”

Traditionally, they wanted to see you supporting a wife and kids because those people cannot take care of themselves; now it’s more that they want you supporting a woman, kids or not kids, and not because she can’t support herself but because she’s the cow they all worship now, with her golden vagina.  This is gynocentricism 101.

Recent history suggests that the American public might actually care more about the existence of a spouse than about whether the marriage is a good one.

. . .

It could be that, at least for a politician’s loyal base, those marital highs and lows are relatable signs of humanity.

And why?  Well, the bad boys in the top 20% have set the standard: competence as a romantic partner is not the point anymore – the point is simply not to be an incel.  Incels were pariahs before the modern era…now they’re super-pariahs.

But Chafe suspects that voters, as suspicious as they are of presidential spouses, would be even more skeptical of a candidate with no spouse or marital prospects at all. “You could be a widower or widow and it would be less important—there’s a sense of it being a normative kind of pattern,” he says. “If you haven’t had that kind of relationship, if you haven’t been married, if you haven’t had a family, you are potentially like a Rorschach. You can read anything into it you want to. And that can be dangerous.” That could be the ultimate challenge for a single candidate: A marriage, even a bad one, is largely understood, but singlehood leaves much to the imagination. And there aren’t many models for how to neutralize the mystery.

I don’t know if it’s really fear of the unknown, but it would make you think that it was, because any sign of incel turns into a feeding frenzy.  Naturally they’re going to assume the worst.  They enjoy assuming the worst.

Here’s the deal: you’ve got to realize that if you’re MGTOW or incel, you’re in a war with everyone around you…it’s not a war fought with guns or fists, but with words and, if it gets really nasty, pieces of paper.  You’ve got to look at everyone around you as the enemy – at least in this one sense.  Unless you move to the barrens of the arctic, you’ve got to be strategic in order to navigate your way through the minefield.  Hell, even if you are headed for no man’s land, you’ve got to find your way out of the minefield.  Yes, I know..  “Thou protesteth too much”…  But we’ve been conditioned to make that point of wisdom the guiding principle, and it has been used to corral us into social traps.  They have their ways of getting us on the hot seat..

Here’s the choice you have: you stonewall at the outset, and brace for however much flack that gets your, or you dig yourself a hole and make everything worse.  It’s a choice between bad options and worse options.

Just remember…it’s their fault, not yours.  They’re the bad guys, you’re the good guy.  You are single because females put you there.  You had no choice over what life you parachuted into.

Senator Ben Sass, the Gynocentric Cuck

BABY GIRL!  BABY GIRL!

 

There has been a lot of buzz lately about about Virginia Gov. Ralph Gosnell Northam’s recent comments, supporting the idea that the fate of a baby born alive, resuscitated if necessary/desired and made “comfortable” should be up for discussion after that point – a suggestion many are calling infanticide.  That controversy seems to be getting lost in subsequent cascading scandal for Northam, after a black-face and KKK costume picture of him and someone else surfaced in a 1984 medical school yearbook, which he apologized for and, at the time of this writing, is backtracking on and denying that it was a photo of him (I think it may have actually been Democrats who did that exposé, as a way to make that governor go away, and making the infanticide stuff go away with it – yeah, good luck on both accounts).

But there’s a finer point that I don’t want to see go away.  Senator Ben Sasse from Nebraska, a never-Trumper, gives an absolutely shameful gynocentric appeal to females in the above video, referring only once to “babies” of both genders (probably on accident), and referencing baby girls no less that five times.  Is he essentially saying that only female babies are worth worrying about?  Is it a political calculation that you’ll get more mileage from female voters with that rhetoric?  Whatever the case, this is some of the most cringe-worthy mass simping of females I’ve seen in a while.

I would love to see a rebuke for antics like this from females, as voters, customers, chat room participants – everywhere you see shameless politicians or thirsty cucks acting like morons by sucking up to women from a distance.  You don’t see it though.  You see women defending guys who are giving them free attention, provided that the simps are far, far away and there is no chance of their toxically undesirable incel semen getting anywhere near their eggs.

Well, I’ll rebuke him.  Fuck Ben Sasse.

Having said that, clearly he’s right on the political issue here per se.  For anyone to decry Third Reich-style eugenics but maintain that it’s okay to snuff out a baby’s life (boy or girl), inside or outside the womb, for what are truly petty reasons, is the height of hypocrisy.  They are really no better than any other misanthrope who doesn’t respect human life at any stage.

Flat-Earth Virginity (And Sasquatch)

Can prolonged virginity make a person go flat-earth?  No, but it can make them just as delusional about human sexuality.  And the average person is not helping anything.

cap00016

 

The flat earth movement is on the rise, like some kind of epidemic mental illness.  Don’t believe it?  See for yourself by doing a search for it.  You’ll see quite a few proponents of the idea, and countless supporters cheering it on as they jeer the critics.  Or, just go into any mainstream public social media forum, and they’ll find you – they’re popping up everywhere.  How widespread is it?  The most pessimistic estimates (pessimistic for “globetards”, as we’re called) are anywhere from around 200,000 to a full 10% of the population.  One estimate claims that 1/3 of 18-24 year olds are on the fence about it. Even if those numbers are hyped, the problem is a serious one.  I mean think about it: flat earth theory is becoming ubiquitous, even in spite of how the geometric properties of Earth are widely observed and applied – not by a few cloistered scientists working for New World Order, Inc., but rather by people in countless disciplines and industries, along with amateur astronomers, photographers, travelers and other observers.  For that reason itself, don’t expect flat earthers to listen to anything you have to tell them, since they dismiss everything said by anyone who is not a fellow flat-earth crank.  After listening to them for a while, out of morbid curiosity, it’s a frightening realization how fragile human cognition really is, and how otherwise “normal” people can be brainwashed into following ideas that are more than just controversial, eccentric and easily falsifiable, but borderline madness.  Of course, they’ll tell you that they follow what they call “zetetic astronomy”, meaning that they only believe what they can see; they don’t see the curve of the earth, and thus, they don’t believe in it.  Never mind all of the other phenomena that point to a spherical earth, like where the sun goes at night…they have a whole battery of self-deluding explanations for it all, and they don’t like being asked to explain them in-depth.  Sound crazy?  It is.  It’s totally nuts.  Maybe it’s psy-op or something.

Now, imagine meeting someone who didn’t believe in the existence of…sex.

That idea may seem even more absurd than the flat earth theory, since the majority of people have been allowed to experience sex, and yet that’s part of the reason you might meet a late-life male virgin who has gone flat-earth on the concept sexual intercourse itself.

Just imagine, for a moment, living in a world where everyone you knew had seen a Sasquatch, except you…

th

Let’s say that it was not a mere legend – in this alternate reality, its existence is accepted by everyone.  It’s something that was kept secret from you by all of the grownups until a certain point in preadolescence, but nonetheless, you had no reason to doubt it, even though you and your peers had never personally seen it yet.  As you grew and entered your mid-teens, some of  your friends here and there would start telling you about how they were having their first sightings of a Sasquatch, usually by sheer serendipity, and sometimes not knowing when the next sighting would be.  You learn about Sasquatch in health class, about what people are doing when they see it and how to avoid being harmed by it, and you see evidence of it everywhere you go – well, that is to say, you know that you’re looking at evidence of Sasquatch only because people have told you that that’s what you’re seeing, and you trust them.  Why would they lie?  As you continue to get older, you pass the average age of first Sasquatch sighting, you graduate from school, and you hear everyone around you talking all the time about seeing Sasquatch.  Many people even have one they keep at home as a pet, but of course, you’re not allowed to see it and you’re not going to ask.

As you keep getting older, this thing that is seemingly everywhere, all around you, all of the time but you’ve never seen yourself, starts to make you wonder where the hell it actually is, and why you’re the only one who can’t see it.  Yes, you still take everyone’s word for it, because it just doesn’t make sense that it would be some grand conspiracy against you and only a handful of other people.  It’s much more likely that there is just something wrong with your vision that makes Sasquatch invisible, and you just need to figure out what that problem is so you can solve it somehow.  Well, don’t expect much help from other people – I mean how do they know why you haven’t seen a Sasquatch out in the woods yet?  They’re all over the place!  Oh, and that’s if you have the nerve to admit it to anyone, because the fact that you haven’t even seen this thing, at your age, is becoming more and more awkward.  Steven Carell and Judd Apatow even made a moving lampooning guys like you.  You start to feel like a circus freak, and you fear that people can tell that you’ve never seen Sasquatch, because you don’t know what they know about the experience of seeing it.  They might even have the nerve to ask you, directly or indirectly, about your Sasquatch encounters, and your insecurity about the questions blow your cover.  Maybe you can connect anonymously with other circus freaks online who likewise haven’t see Sasquatch, and exchange notes, eh?  Yeah, get ready for a mishmash of kook theories that try to explain it all, but don’t go anywhere and are merely the result of mental festering of the afflicted.

There comes a point when your situation becomes so nonsensical that you inevitably start to question everything you thought you knew about Sasquatch.  Again, you’ve now gone 30+ years, in what is said to be Sasquatch country, and you’ve never seen one.  Everyone around you has, reportedly, but you haven’t.  Are you really that crazy because you start to wonder if Sasquatch really exists?  Nothing you’ve ever been told about Sasquatch would make you think that you wouldn’t have seen it by now, so it comes down to a conflict between what your eyes tell you, and what others tell you.  Sure, you know intellectually that it must exist, because something has to be wrong with you – it can’t be that everyone around you is lying.  But these are the same people who have been telling you that in order to see the hairy primate with big feet, you have to do this big, long, stupid rain dance to get it to come out of the woods, and as far as you can tell, you’ve done it right…but still no sign of the beast.  And what about them?  They seem to run into ol’ Bigfoot all the time, and you know they haven’t been doing what they say you have to do to get your first sighting.  This is where you start to lose your mind.  Your own left brain just can’t keep insisting to your right brain that this ubiquitous ape exists, and there’s no explanation for why you can’t see it, other than a grand, hilarious coincidence.  The right brain just doesn’t believe it anymore.  It has lost faith in the left brain.  Just like the moron flat earthers ceased to believe that the earth is round, you cease to believe in Sasquatch.

So there you are.  You’ve lost trust in everyone around you, they’ve lost all respect for you, you’ve lost your mental faculties…and guess who isn’t coming out of the woods to make it all right: Sasquatch.  Oh, you know that motherfucker isn’t coming to the rescue now – not after all it obviously did to hide from you so that you’d end up this way.  You’re on your own.

Well, there is one option…  Just like the flat earther can pony up the dough for a convincing 70,000-foot ride in a MiG-25 to see the curve, the guy who has never seen Sasquatch can pay to go see one in captivity.  Oh sure, people would frown upon him for going to one of those private zoos on the edge of town, but it’s either that, or he just lets his sanity slip away, like a vine slipping out of his no-longer-willing hands as he sinks into the quicksand.  Of course, Sasquatch will still be everywhere and still hiding from him, but at least the earth will be round again.

Heh…and then all the people in this big round world who help make sure that prolonged virginity ruins a man’s life just can’t believe that some guys end up hating Sasquatch enough to go out hunting it with guns and Ryder vans…  Those are the same fucking do-gooder dipshits trying to shut down legal brothels.

Go ahead, dip-fucks – keep trying to remove options for incels, just like you were pulling control rods out of the Chernobyl reactor.

ch1

Another Incel Attack Almost Happened

National Post: Man cites virginity as reason he planned to kill ‘as many girls’ as he could, Utah police say

“All I wanted was a girlfriend, not 1000 not a bunch of hoes not money none of that,” he wrote, according to a probable-cause statement cited by authorities. “All I wanted was to be loved, yet no one cares about me I’m 27 years old and I’ve never had a girlfriend before and I’m still a virgin, this is why I’m planning on shooting up a public place soon and being the next mass shooter cause I’m ready to die and all the girls the turned me down is going to make it right by killing as many girls as I see.”

I first learned about this on Infowars, who reposed it from Michael Snyder on the Economic Collapse.  That author said a couple of interesting things…

The stories that I am about to share with you barely made a blip on the news, but they should have,

Yeah, now why didn’t this one make the news?  Is it because the media is not interested unless there is blood and guts, or is it because the feminists haven’t gotten a hold of it yet?  I’m sure they’d tell you that they don’t want to give it notoriety, so as to prevent more attacks, but it’s a little late for that, a this stage in the game (as I’ll explain below).

Unfortunately, the only values that many of our young men have are the values that they have been fed by Hollywood, and Christopher Wayne Cleary was so frustrated with his inability to live up to the Hollywood ideal that he was ready to go on a mass shooting spree.

“All I wanted was a girlfriend, not 1000 not a bunch of hoes not money none of that,”

So write that down: having a girlfriend and not being a virgin at age 27 is now the Hollywood ideal.  Hmm…sounds reasonable…

What have we been saying for a long time now?  We’ve known that there would be more Incel attacks.  I’ve written about it at length.  I wrote about it just the other day.  You’d think that conspiracy-minded right-wing intelligentsia would be picking up on the reasons for this by now too, would you not?  Nope.  They’re too caught up in their own male dominance instincts, which makes them default to deriding incels as dangerous losers who need to be dominated some more, and made even more incel.  Same with post-noncel MGTOW.

See, guys like Alex Jones and Paul Joseph Watson…you would think that if anyone prominent had any genuine esoteric knowledge of what incel is all about, it would be those guys, right?  Nope.  Remember this post I made after the Alek Minassian attack and after Infowars weighed in.  Those guys were bad boys in their youth, and they still are.  Paul Joseph Watson was some kind of stoner/rebel bad boy, and Alex Jones was a pretty boy, weight-lifter rich kid who got cleaned house when it came to pussy.  People don’t really change – they’re going to continue to the play dominant jock who bashes the incel nerd, all the way through life.  It’s really all a chance to relive the dominance hierarchy that was established in childhood between the nerds and the bullies/jocks.  “Hey, I know you!  I used to beat the shit out of you when we were kids!  Let’s do it again!”  Their past abuses of weak, isolated, budding incels will be looked back upon with nostalgia and justified as the  “right thing to do” because, it is assumed, all those nerds become the left-wingers trying to destroy the world.  Well, that’s not really how it happens, but these hero-jock types will always set up a narrative that glorifies themselves, demonizes incels, makes the gynocracy swoon, and dovetails right into their narrative of their larger fight against evil and globalism.  There was even a video in that post (now removed because of political censorship) where Alex Jones of all people was calling for incels to be profiled.  Hard to believe, but true.

Incels really are on their own.  Tradcons aren’t your friends.  Conspiracy theorists aren’t your friends.  Liberal feminists certainly aren’t your friends.  Right-wingers aren’t your friends.  Left-wingers aren’t your friends.  MGTOW aren’t your friends.

The more things change, the more they stay the same: incels have always been at the bottom of humanity, and no matter what humanity morphs into, they’re still at the bottom.  In wartime situations, they send you to the front lines based on a lack of marriage or relationships, to be used as target practice for the enemy.  Incels are universally disrespected in all cultures, by people of all ages and all other social dispositions.  Respect for any man who utterly lacks female validation is virtually unheard of…

And that’s how we knew, and still know, that more incel attacks are on the way.

Society consistently fails to see what is causing this problem.  They appeal to their own sense of disrespect for incels, which just inspires more of these uprisings.  You see, the act of mass killing is what an unstable person who seeks vindication uses as a last resort – the last lever they have to pull, as far as they can see, anyway.  Although “normies” prefer to project the fantasy of all incels being potential mass murders, so as to create an opportunity to “beat them into submission” in some fashion, physically or otherwise (a renewal of the established dominance hierarchy that was established on the school playground), we know that there is probably no higher proportion of psychopathic killers in the incel population than the general population.  But as I’ve said, as the incel demographic grows like a wildfire, the number of psychopathic killer incels grows right along with it, and the attacks will become more frequent.

So how can I blame this on society?  Because what actually happens is that incel killers do get some form of vindication when they do their thing – no, not from the rest of society, but even from the rest of the incelosphere.  When Alek Minassian wrote, “All hail the Supreme Gentleman Elliot Rodger!” what do you think that did to the wheels turning in the heads of those on the fringe?  Now of course, the rest of the world (led by feminists) thinks that breaking up the online incel community and restricting/censoring all of their social networks is the solution to the problem, and of course they would think that – they already hated incels, and it’s perfect justification.  This won’t work of course, because incel is becoming so ubiquitous that incel connections and rhetoric is turning up everywhere you go, and trying to shut them all down is actually going to exacerbate the problem because you take away the incel community’s own degree of self-regulation.  There are times on an incel forum when someone will start talking a little bit psycho, and other incels will rein them in – it’s not the hive of mass murder fantasy and planning that is portrayed to the public.  Most incels try to talk sense into other members who talk like that, because they understand how real the danger is, and they have respect for each other.

I know, I know…you can’t expect noncels to understand any of this.  All you can do is sit back, and enjoy or endure, depending on how jaded you are.