The Lesson of the Pussy March: Modern Women are Beyond Hope

img_4046

As all men should know, the only way to win with a woman is to simply agree with her, and even at that, it’s only a temporary win – you’ll lose in the end, in a big bad way.  Women don’t reason like men do – they tend to emote.  Oh sure, they are capable of being reasonable, but that doesn’t really matter when they are choosing not to be.  Like all other creatures, they are going to do what comes naturally unless there is some kind of reason or incentive to do something else.  For as long as women have been getting their way by running their mouths, throwing tantrums and leveraging their sexuality, what reasonable interaction they may or may not be capable of is irrelevant.

It should come as no surprise that they are going to be pretty easily regimented and used as pink-headed pawns for both the obvious and the more shadowy political forces against President Trump, and the worldwide movement against globalism.  It’s not like they even had to build a new straw man from scratch – the die was cast long ago for this.  The globalist left, which thrives and conquers by dividing people into various groups and then pits them against each other (identity politics 101), makes the most use of those groups that are easily riled up.  While a lot of what we see today of this is a product of long and careful political cultivation – as is the case with Obama-era race baiting and race riots, which any race would be susceptible to – there is a special kind of hair-triggered reactionary utility in women, especially in the 3rd wave of feminism.  For example, all it took was one inarticulate comment from a police chief in Toronto to spark a worldwide movement of “Slutwalks“, which are an assertion of the narrative that women should be able to dress as provocatively as they want and not be raped – which is valid from a legal, moral and idealistic standpoint…just not from a practical one.  When you look at it from a simple risk management perspective – something they don’t merely overlook but explicitly reject, saying that we should “teach men not to rape” instead – it should be easy to see that there isn’t a lot of hard thought and reasoning behind the movement.

If leftist/feminist reactionary movements like the Slutwalks, or yesterday’s Women’s March on Washington and sister movements, were just a comical display of a few fringe kooks here and there throwing tantrums over the inauguration, this discussion would be unnecessary…but no, they are pretty huge – in the millions at a time, albeit not all in the same place.  Of course, the enormity of it all is something they want us to notice, and we do, but not in the way they are hoping.  The message we are supposed to get from yesterday’s demonstration is…well, there isn’t really a coherent message because (owing to the leftist political origins of these things) it basically turned into a mishmash of liberal dog whistle issues.  It reminds me of Occupy Wall Street – does anyone really know what exactly that was all about?  No, because it wasn’t really about anything specific – it was just a big feel-good tantrum being thrown by social justice warriors who felt like they weren’t getting their way.  In the case of this weekend’s vaginal protests, at least it was spurned by them actually not getting their way in the election last November (and it’s about damn time).

So what is the real lesson from all of this?  That is, beyond the fact that women are angry about the election (between Donald Trump winning and Hillary Clinton losing, who knows which is the more bitter pill for them to swallow, or if it even matters)?  I guarantee that it isn’t over any practical considerations, since I haven’t heard anyone say that they are worried about Donald Trump’s “locker room” behavior translating into federal policy that would hurt women.  No, I think that the lesson from it can be found in their numbers: that you could have that many women, all over the country and the world, join such an aimless, thoughtless, pointless blind rage like that is not only a testament to what extent the female gender is marbled with poisonous ideology, but a testament to just how stunted the gender is on the whole.  Look: nobody is perfect, and we all need to be reined in by voices of reason sometimes, but these massive demonstrations makes clear that there is a catastrophic proportion of human females who cannot and will not respond constructively to being contradicted or rebuked.  They are pulling the whole gender off the rails.

Some may say that this is nothing new: when a woman makes her mind up about something, she cannot be swayed, and will not listen to anyone.  While that may be true for most of them, when you have a massive, generations-long infusion of ideology that is carefully designed to dovetail into that tendency…well, it’s like Vladimir Lenin’s seed that will never be uprooted.  Not only does the ubiquity and intensity of this stuff make gender relations utterly hopeless, but when you look at the fruit salad of leftist narratives and proclamations being expressed in these female marches, it’s easy to see where this all comes from.  In this current pussy march (not to be confused with Pussy Riot, although there is enough overlap that it doesn’t matter) you see plugs for everything: socialism, homosexuality, transsexualism (kind of ironic), Islamophilia, abortion, russophobia (the new “red scare” – oh if only the friendly Soviets were still running things!), misandry, anarchy and lawlessness, all mortared together with a sludge of degenerate language, imagery and innuendo – just look at some of their signs, and that will tell you everything.

Now remember, these women are far, far beyond being contradicted or even reasoned with, and they are in the millions – and that’s just the ones who actually took the time to buy a stupid pink hat and go stamping around in the cold.  Sadly, I’m afraid that these women aren’t in the minority – this is what most women are like today.

What can you do about it?  As far as the women themselves are concerned, pretty much nothing.  You can, however, evaluate your own circumstances and plan accordingly – be pragmatic.  This may involve taking some conscious steps in order to get through this life with 21st century females in one piece (maybe):

  1. Limit your interactions with females to the minimum
  2. Avoid forming any new ties with females
  3. Navigate through necessary interactions defensively and with caution
  4. Never invest any time and effort into trying to level with or understanding a female
  5. Learn their mind games, and how to avoid getting snared
  6. Learn how to assert yourself, when the time comes, in a way that disgusts them enough to get out of your life without pissing them off so much that they want revenge
  7. Always be vigilant – remember that females today are legitimately dangerous in ways that they never were before, and you have to stay one step ahead in order to protect yourself

This all boils down to going your own way (MGTOW) in the true sense – that’s not joining a discussion forum with other bitter guys and feeding off each other’s red pill rage, allowing these women to live rent-free in your head.  It’s about going your own way, and not looking back.

Or, if you don’t believe me, take the blue pill…and good luck to you.  You’re going to need it.

Advertisements

19 comments

  1. I was unaware that this blog WAS a MGTOW forum. Not that I disagree with your views.
    It’s interesting to note that many wise men view HUMANITY ITSELF (The collective) as female.
    Whether it’s public speakers, politicians, or tyrants. (Hitler said a good public speaker should
    see the masses as “female.” That is why the “Big Lie” technique works.)
    T.B.L. is working in Europe now. That’s why they offer up their daughter’s as sacrifical lambs.
    It’s been working in the U.S. since the 1960’s. “Civil Rights” can cover any crime or falsehood.
    Proof of God? I got my proof on Nov. 8th 2016 Lets just hope that a more sans society will
    result.

  2. I think any man who (a) values his sanity, and (b) is not in the top 20% of men who make women instantly wet, needs to take this stuff on board. Seriously. Because it’s your hide if you don’t.

    And if we are talking about getting your sexual needs met…well here is an old quote form fuck knows where; If it floats, flies, or fucks, it’s usually cheaper just to rent it’

  3. Some ARE ugly and beyond hope for any number of reasons. I fess up.
    I won’t be around for robots, and would be unable to afford one anyway.
    There can be no way this will have a happy ending.

  4. B.D.M.G.:
    If it’s not too personal, what kind of work do you do? Are you surrounded by women?
    How do you get along with them? If you had your present attitude, how did you get your
    employment to begin with? Certainly you would get canned if your fellow employees
    knew your real views. Are you apprehensive? Can you survive off the grid if need be?

    1. I actually appreciate your curiosity, but for someone who says the things I do, in a public arena like this – even innocuous details, with respect to security and identity – would be an invitation for ad hominem attacks from the enemy (who will surely find this blog, sooner or later). That’s best case scenario – worst case scenario is what you bring up with the employer example, and that’s just one of many things that could happen as a result of being “outed” on this stuff. It’s sad but true: the age of safe and free speech is behind us. Rather than saying anything about myself, I let my writings speak for themselves, and those who know what it’s all about won’t need to see any credentials.

  5. I only ask the question because I wonder how you got your foot in the door.
    Another words, how did you apply for work being AMONG women when you knew their
    tendencies, or did you GRADUALLY develop your views?
    Rants Of An Incel is probably the greatest hater of women on the net, yet he claims to
    have lucrative employment. How can a person “act” one way for the better part of the day,
    to put on a convincing “show” and not slip up? In today’s society, you don’t have the luxery
    of a single mistake. I think an “Into The Wild” solution works best. The book is about a
    young man who simply diasppears into nature. He drives west, ditches his car in the
    desert, and gets lost in nature.

  6. “As all men should know, the only way to win with a woman is to simply agree with her…”

    That is the procedure with a woman that you HAVE to work under, or with.
    Otherwise, interacting with women has become like playing “Global Thermonuclear Warfare”: “the only way to win is not to play”. So, the only way to ‘win’ nowadays is to turn your back, walk away, and shun all unnecessary contact.
    Women made the world this way, not me — I’m just trying to live in it.

    1. This kind of life is really quite doable, particulaly if you are fortunate enough to have a line of work that keeps your interaction with women really low. Some have observed that when you go for a long time with little or no interaction with them, absence doesn’t really make the heart grow fonder. In fact I think what happens to a lot of guys is that they end up losing a lot of their tolerance for their bullshit. All of the mind games, the emotional tactics, the trickery – you end up having no tolerance for it, and consequently, it becomes even more difficult to interact with them. Is that a good or a bad thing? I guess that it’s irrelevant if you reach the ideal of zero contact.

      1. I have to admit that I reached the idea of “zero contact” when I was in my thirties and my hormones finally stopped percolating. When the ‘hormone haze’ lifted, it was as if I was finally seeing the world with a different outlook; I used to think that it was a ‘new’ outlook, but as I further aged I slowly came to realize that it was almost the same kind of outlook on females that I had, just before I went through puberty and adolescence. If any such male is also observant, he can also see the similarities in female behavior, principally in how they behave almost the same way that they did back in middle school.
        In my own opinion, having no tolerance for their mind games, emotional tactics, manipulation, and outright trickery is a VERY good thing — for the simple reason that, by avoiding interaction with such females who exhibit such traits (and how many — if any — of them don’t?), you can at least avoid the financial drain on your resources that they demand you make, to say nothing of the false accusations, manipulation, needless drama, and other emotional bullsh*t that they seem to need to bring with them everywhere they go.

        1. A woman will leverage both her own sexuality and a man’s sexuality against him in order to get him to make an investment – that’s what that financial drain is: an investment. Now what happens when you see a stock plummet, and millions of people lose everything? People stop buying that stock, which is what causes them to lose their investment – basic economics here. If you see people walk out onto a frozen lake, and half of them fall through and die of hypothermia, what sensible person walks out onto that lake knowing that?

          You could think of dating as playing slot machines (no pun intended), long-term relationships as gambling bigger money at roulette and card tables, a marriage as dumping your life savings into one stock. Sounds risky and stupid, right? Of course they’ll tell you, “Well you have to make sure that you really know the person first.” Everyone thought they did that, when they said “I do”. Can you think of anyone who went into a marriage with a cavalier, happy-go-lucky attitude, in the hypothetical fashion that people will cite to explain the roughly 50% divorce rate?

          When you talk to eternal optimists who have been divorced, and they try to give account for their own marital failure, they will almost always give some cliché response about how it all failed because they were young and stupid, and didn’t really know the other person or themselves. That’s probably what today’s 29-year-olds (currently the lowest divorce risk bracket for age of first marriage) will be saying a few years from now. Furthermore, when you see a chart that shows divorce risk by age, the curve always goes down-down-down until you get to around 29, and of course the propaganda there is that the longer you wait, the less risky it is. Ah, but you’ll also notice that they cut the chart off at that age, and there’s a reason – when you continue the chart into 30s and 40s, you’ll see that starting in the early 30s, the divorce risk goes up again, and in fact skyrockets. By the time you get to early 40s, divorce risk is again as high as it was in your late teens.

          Anyway, the bottom line is that women, from a financial perspective, is for people who…simply don’t know any better.

          1. “You could think of dating as playing slot machines (no pun intended)…”

            I have to admit that your comparison of dating and playing slot machines DID bring a series of interesting (and possibly comical) mental images to my mind — if I was any kind of artist, I’d definitely try to put them to paper.

  7. I have no relationships with them because I am the most OMEGA of the OMEGAS.
    But my glands have not gotten the message.
    That’s just one reason among many others why I live in HELL.

    1. Here’s the most bitter irony about that: if you read my blog entry about castration, and follow the research I link to, you’ll see that elective castration not only isn’t on-demand but nearly impossible to get (in the US anyway). For some odd reason, “the man” has pretty much shut down the idea…that is, unless you are getting an double-orchiectomy in the context of a sex change, which of course is now a protected, celebrated and exalted thing these day. You see the bullshit in that? In other words, if you want to have your nards removed for the sake of modifying your own natural biology in accordance with your own mental illness and your twisted, deviant view of reality, then it’s a-okay; but if you want them removed because females have unanimously decided not to let them have any function other than causing you misery, not only is it a big fat NO, but you’re likely to cause trouble for yourself by simply asking.

      Not that I’m suggesting anything, nor am I claiming to know the terrain of a sex change program, but what if a guy played it up like he was getting a sex change and (assuming they don’t start pumping you full of female hormones first) he only went as far as getting the orchiectomy, and then dropped out? It might be better to go out of the country than go through all that self-demeaning shit.

  8. When I was born, the “nads” weren’t in the proper position. A natural born ehunic.
    I had “corrective” surgery to put them in place. But I STILL have no reason to use them,
    though supposedly they “work.”
    Do you know what that’s like? It’s like an astute child that doesn’t believe in Santa Clus
    who gets mislead into believing that Santa DOES exist, only to find out that he was lied to
    twice!

    1. THAT is an interesting comparison, RE:Santa Claus.
      As a MGTOW, I’d use it to put it like this: “in today’s society, a man being told that “there are ‘Good Women’ out there, you just have to find them”, is like being a kid and being told, “Santa Claus REALLY exists, you just have to find him; then you’ll get all kinds of presents”.
      An Ugly Truth is preferable to a Pretty Lie.

  9. People think they’re doing you a favor, encouraging you.
    But if they persuade you, and put their well meaning disinformation in your mind,
    your worse off then before. It’s like the newspaper colum “Yes Virgina, there IS a
    Santa Claus!”

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s