Month: June 2019

Cam Whore Strangles Herself, Dead Man To Blame

I don’t even know how to describe the many levels of bullshit I see in this story…  Are females ever responsible for anything??  How is it that a female can strangle herself, die in the process, and it’s still somehow the fault of a man, somewhere out in cyberspace?

And then they call her “intelligent”…

Woman dies while performing ‘degrading’ webcam sex for perv

Disability worker Hope Barden, 21, was moonlighting as a webcam girl to make extra cash when pervert Jerome Dangar, 45, paid her to strangle herself —  then watched as she suffocated in March 2018 without calling for help.  But Dangar — who police said encouraged Barden to perform increasingly dangerous sex acts during their three-month relationship — will never face charges after he was found dead in his prison cell on April 15 this year.

They’re making this cam whore out to be some wonderful young woman – “beautiful and intelligent” – and such a poor, poor victim of some guy whom the author of the article, “Ebony Bowden” of the New York Post, calls a creep and a pervert.  Let’s see – she was performing autoerotic asphyxiation on herself for money, but somehow, that’s not perverted?  Maybe I’m a bit straight-laced or something, but I don’t think I’ve ever even heard of someone doing that until now, and I bet you haven’t either.  I’m going to say that this qualifies as a perversion of sexual reproduction.

And as many in the comments section of the Fox News reprint of this article asked, what was he supposed to do, exactly?  He would be oblivious to her her real name and location – that would be a safety thing.  Is there a toll-free hotline on the website you’re supposed to call if your cam whore strangles herself?  Seems a bit unreasonable to charge him with manslaughter for this…but then, unreasonable treatment was all this guy was ever going to get.

Oh, and by the way – they were not in a three-month “relationship”.   A cam whore with a regular customer does not amount to a “relationship”.  Boy, just imagine where they could go with that, regarding common-law marriage and “palimony“.  You paid a cam whore to flash you?  She now gets half your shit!

Of course, he died in his prison cell – of what, we’re not told – and the consensus seems to be that the only tragedy about his death was that he couldn’t be charged for this.

“We are sorely disappointed that this case can no longer bring any legal justice for Hope.”

“The death of Dangar ultimately prevented prosecutors from charging him in connection with Hope’s death as a result of sexually related role-play,” Detective Inspector John Quilty from Staffordshire Police said. “Hope was a 21-year-old woman and her death was tragic,” he added.

Why is his death not tragic?  Why should he be charged with her death?

Because vagina!  That’s why.

Barden’s mother said her daughter — who worked as a disability carer but became a webcam girl to earn extra money — was “beautiful and intelligent” and called for better regulation of the industry.  “Anyone with daughters or other relatives involved in this terrible industry must be aware of the risk of harm,” Kate Barden said in a statement released through Staffordshire Police.

Better regulation of the industry…  Okay, what did this grieving mother have in mind, in the way of regulations?  I mean, she must have some good ideas – after all, it’s not like she raised a girl without teaching her the dangers of suffocating yourself for money, right?  Well I can think of a couple of ideas: maybe that aforementioned emergency hotline, for the stupid ones…or perhaps cam whores should be notified that a lack of oxygen can lead to death, and they probably shouldn’t do it upon request.  Beyond that, what?  Should they check up on all the cam johns and make sure none of them are “creeps” who might leave a poor damsel in distress to suffocate?  Well, I guess if cam whoring becomes no-creeps-allowed then the poor little floozies are not going to be able to make that extra money, and they’ll need a check from the government…oh wait, right – they just don’t want any creeps who won’t call the number that doesn’t exist when the girl on the other side chokes to death.  Boy, this is all starting to make sense now!

He was separately convicted of possession of extreme pornographic images in January 2019 and jailed for 15 months.

So what’s “extreme pornographic images” in England?  Is it child porn, or something else?  I ask because it seems I read somewhere that they’re effectively outlawing porn in the UK, unless it’s taxed, so I don’t really know how far the anti-porn forces over there have gone, and what kind of smut this guy might have been locked away for.  If it was anything less that child porn, I’ll be that being charged with manslaughter for what some stupid cam whore did to herself probably wasn’t a surprise when he got the news.  Maybe he killed himself, or maybe some white knight cuck in prison killed him..?  I guess we’ll never know.  Going by the spin in this article, I guess it doesn’t matter either.

So, the moral of the story?  Well there are a few, actually:

  1. Men are always responsible for the actions of women – even women of unknown identity and location.
  2. Stupid women are “intelligent”.
  3. A woman strangling herself for money isn’t perverted, but watching it is.
  4. Even if there was nothing you could do to save her, you still should have done something.
  5. A woman needs air to survive.

Tee-hee.

 

US Military vs. Incels

We have arrived at a point when even the most paranoid estimates of incel persecution have been surpassed by reality.  Wonder no more about why young guys are always so worried that they’ll never get laid – not only is it degrading, discouraging and frankly mind-rotting, but it now gets you branded as a military combatant!

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2019/06/leaked-us-air-force-briefing-discusses-4chan-and-the-threat-of-incels/

https://taskandpurpose.com/air-force-joint-base-andrews-incels-threat-brief

At least one Air Force base is on the lookout for a sinister new threat: angry men who can’t get laid.

Okay, all you Elliot Sodini wannabes: you have their attention.  No, they’re not going to help you get laid – at best, they’re going to take you out with a drone strike.

tempsnip

For the Air Force’s part, these Twatter posts that the Gateway Pundit reposted took the words right out of my mouth…

Have they developed any countermeasures? Are we thinking bombing? Drones? Seems like air superiority won’t be a problem.

Small Diameter Deep Basement Penetrator.  Low collateral damage weapon that can be dropped by most drones, or even hand thrown.  Render the basement uninhabitable and the incel is defeated

I won’t believe the Air Force has declared incels a threat until they’ve claimed they require the F-35 to effectively fight them.

Are we totally sure — hear me out — that incels aren’t just mistaking drag queens for Stacys?

…but it’s not like we assume that this is limited to the USAF.  I guarantee you, it comes from the Pentagon (and from the SPLC before that) and you’ll find similar briefings in all of the US Armed Forces.

One of my first impulses was that this may be the result of the Soetoro Administration turning America’s military brass into a sorority – after all, if you know anything about the female thought process on reproduction, you know that they understand two kinds of men: tall, sexy, swaggering bad boys, and creepy loser incels who must be killed (even the bull dykes in the military process it this way).  It’s really not a stretch to think that some of this childlike mentality will have seeped into official policy, as it inevitably would.  On the other hand, new names I didn’t recognize – Brian Isaack Clyde, Scott Beierle, Christopher Wayne Cleary – seem to indicate that what I said a year ago about the Incel Revolution being underway was pretty much correct.  Even I can’t keep up with the incidents coming down the pike.  I’m going to have to get a list going I suppose.

Of course, the tradcucks and white knights of all political stripes are more than happy to throw de-selected men under the bus, on behalf of the women targeting them (also of all political stripes).  Even Infowars, which is supposed to be against all forms of tyranny, couldn’t care less about incels being profiled and persecuted – in fact, they’re all for it.  Again, as Alex Jones was a ladies man when he was younger (according to him), he won’t even recognize the insidiousness of this.  It all goes right over the heads of everyone who has never lived it.

First they came for the _______, and I said nothing, because I wasn’t a _______.

Then they came for the _______, and I said nothing, because I wasn’t a _______.

Then they came for the incels, and I cheered that on because, needless to say, I sure as hell wasn’t ever one of those losers.  I mean in retrospect, that persecution is one I can still live with.  Oh if only it had stopped there…

But then they came for the _______, and I said nothing, because I wasn’t a _______….

So if you thought that the Incel Revolution was going to make anything happen in your favor, the way Islamic terrorism has worked out for the radical Muslims as they take over the world…no, you thought wrong.  You see how it’s shaping up?  With every step “forward” that you think the more brazen incels take with their events and attempts, all incels move two or three steps back.  The Lagomorphocracy is all queued up and ready to ratchet up the countermeasures.

There’s only one way you can avoid the consequences of the incel attackers’ actions: don’t be an incel.  If that’s not an option…go into hiding.  Ghost in plain site, don’t tell anyone anything about yourself – not even things that they could ascertain your incel status by deduction – and beyond that, just….I dunno.  Good luck!  You now have the most powerful military on earth after you, and unlike other belligerents, you’re one they actually want to destroy.  So yeah, good luck.  Oh, and as tempting as it may be to thank “Becky & Stacy” for this…just don’t.  Go into hiding.  We’ll see you on the other side.  Maybe.

“Send Bachelors And Come Heavily Armed”

Apparently, the lives of MGTOW and incel men still don’t matter, as much as at any point in history.

This statement was made by an Oregon state senator, in response to the current crisis – the Democrats trying to get an economically suicidal cap-and-trade bill passed, with the Republicans walking out after negotiations broke down (there were actual negotiations with a Commiecrat super-majority?) and denying the Democrats a quorum, which prompted the Oregon governor (a typical blue-state switch-hitter) to send the Oregon State Police to arrest them and bring them back.  Now they’re shutting the Senate down due to a “possible militia threat” from right-wing groups (which is just the Democrats playing drama queen victims – tomorrow you’ll see some gay couples burning their own houses down and claiming it was the Bundy family).  In this situation, contrary to the Dems’ claims that Republicans have decided to “turn their back on their constituents who they are honor-bound to represent here in this building,” they’re doing exactly what their constituents want them to do, by stopping the bill any way they can – in this case, by not being in the building.

Anyway, there’s the back story – now let’s get to what’s important to us.

One Republican senator named Brian Boquist said, “Send bachelors and come heavily armed … I’m not going to be a political prisoner in the state of Oregon. It’s just that simple.”  Good on him!  Well, except for the part about the bachelors.

What he’s saying is a reference to the age-old policy of favoritism for married men over bachelors.  Some may say that he’s not serious, but on some level, he probably is.  A look at his bio shows that he himself is married, and customarily speaking, if imply that a particular demographic is basically cannon fodder, and you’re not in that demographic yourself, then that means you probably mean it.  Now if this were the Mormon state of Utah, where bachelors above the age of 27 are considered a “menace to society”, he probably would have said, send bachelors and bring us arms – we’ll have target practice!

Ah, isn’t it interesting?  Look at how many demographics are getting their day of recognition and respect in the 21st century…  Females, racial minorities, Muslims, sexual deviants, so-called refugees, homeless people…  We’re all supposed to drop everything and apologize to them for being better of than they are, or apologize for what someone who looked like us in one way or another did to someone who looked like them, decades or centuries ago.  But have you noticed that one group still isn’t getting respect from anyone?  Men without women.  Whether by choice or by circumstance, there have always been and will always be a certain number of men who will fly solo.  They’ve always been frowned upon, not because they are a burden on society or some kind of nuisance, but for the same reason that weaker, isolated animals (and especially human children) are attacked by stronger, more popular and more established members of their own species: it’s the natural behavior found in a tournament species, and in humanity, it becomes a predator-prey paradigm.  You might have been able to chalk all forms of bigoted oppression up to the same phenomenon, but for some reason, in spite of all the “progress” that humanity makes as it becomes so “enlightened” or whatever, single men are still excluded from humanity’s reforms against that kind of jungle rule…

Ironic isn’t it?  Still a the back of the line, with women, and in broader society.

You’ll notice that when it comes to such reforms, a given demographic will only get an edge in the game of identity/grievance politics when they have enough numbers to matter, but even as incel’s and MGTOW’s numbers increase well into the millions, they still aren’t getting traction.  Is it because they’re not playing the identity politics game, or is it because the purveyors of identity politics (liberals and socialists) have no utility for single men, owing to their inherent ruggedness and independence?  As with all things, I guess we’ll find out.  Or we won’t.

In the mean time, I don’t need to tell anyone, of those who would read this blog, that humanity is no closer to accepting MGTOW or incel men than they ever were.  Hostility toward unattached men is on an upward trajectory, and guys like Elliot Rodger, who make examples of themselves, are not helping matters…yet matters are cultivating those kinds of rouges.  It’s a vicious cycle, and unless you have a female to mate with, you’re caught right in the middle of it.

I guess that’s one thing that female validation is still good for…  Is it worth it?

Nah.

Welcome to 1984: You’re a “Hate Agent”, and Your Social Credit Score Sucks

Yes, you!  You’re a hate agent just for clicking on this blog.

https://www.breitbart.com/tech/2019/06/13/exclusive-facebooks-process-to-label-you-a-hate-agent-revealed/

I know, this isn’t facebook, but no person who reads this blog with any regularity has any illusions about how we all have a “social credit score” that the not publicly acknowledged, and is standardized across all platforms of the Silicon Valley technocracy.  We also know that use of the acronym MGTOW is considered a hate group by the Southern Poverty Law Center (a unit of the Democrat party) which has become the go-to agency for what is considered hateful and outside of the Overton Window, just like Webster’s has become the go-to for definitions.  Don’t think WordPress is any different – they’re all about it, I promise you.  When you write the acronym MGTOW, or even click on too many links with MGTOW, these all set off triggers in the almighty algorithm, and that information is fed into your social credit score.  Even private conversations are monitored by the Borg, and fed into the algorithm.

Oh, and in case there were any doubt…the people running this stuff are all authoritarian Marxists.  By now, the fact that left-leaning ideologies and control-freakdom go hand-in-hand is self-evident, as is the fact that these people do not have your best interests at heart.

Facebook monitors the offline behavior of its users to determine if they should be categorized as a “Hate Agent,” according to a document provided exclusively to Breitbart News by a source within the social media giant.

The document, titled “Hate Agent Policy Review” outlines a series of “signals” that Facebook uses to determine if someone ought to be categorized as a “hate agent” and banned from the platform.

Those signals include a wide range of on- and off-platform behavior. If you praise the wrong individual, interview them, or appear at events alongside them, Facebook may categorize you as a “hate agent.”

Facebook may also categorize you as a hate agent if you self-identify with or advocate for a “Designated Hateful Ideology,” if you associate with a “Designated Hate Entity” (one of the examples cited by Facebook as a “hate entity” includes Islam critic Tommy Robinson), or if you have “tattoos of hate symbols or hate slogans.” (The document cites no examples of these, but the media and “anti-racism” advocacy groups increasingly label innocuous items as “hate symbols,” including a cartoon frog and the “OK” hand sign.)

Facebook will also categorize you as a hate agent for possession of “hate paraphernalia,” although the document provides no examples of what falls into this category.

The document also says Facebook will categorize you as a hate agent for “statements made in private but later made public.” Of course, Facebook holds vast amounts of information on what you say in public and in private — and as we saw with the Daily Beast doxing story, the platform will publicize private information on their users to assist the media in hitjobs on regular American citizens.

Breitbart News has already covered some of the individuals that Facebook placed on its list of potential “hate agents.” Paul Joseph Watson eventually was categorized as “hateful” and banned from the platform, in part, according to the document, because he praised Tommy Robinson and interviewed him on his YouTube channel. Star conservative pundit Candace Owens and conservative author and terrorism expert Brigitte Gabriel were also on the list, as were British politicians Carl Benjamin and Anne Marie Waters.

The Benjamin addition reveals that Facebook may categorize you as a hate agent merely for speaking neutrally about individuals and organizations that the social network considers hateful. In the document, Facebook tags Benjamin with a “hate agent” signal for “neutral representation of John Kinsman, member of Proud Boys” on October 21 last year.

Facebook also accuses Benjamin, a classical liberal and critic of identity politics, as “representing the ideology of an ethnostate” for a post in which he calls out an actual advocate of an ethnostate.

In addition to the more unorthodox signals that Facebook uses to determine if its users are “hate agents,” there is also, predictably, “hate speech.” Facebook divides hate speech into three tiers depending on severity and considers attacks on a person’s “immigration status” to be hate speech.

Here’s how “hate speech” — both on and off Facebook — will be categorized by the platform, according to the document:

Individual has made public statements, or statements made in private and later made public, using Tier 1, 2, or 3 hate speech or slurs:

3 instances in one statement or appearance = signal
5 instances in multiple statements or appearances over one month = signal

If you’ve done this within the past two years, Facebook will consider it a hate signal.

Other signals used by Facebook to determine if its users should be designated as hate agents include carrying out violence against people based on their “protected or quasi-protected characteristics,” attacks on places of worship, and conviction of genocide.

I also happen to know, anecdotally, that Facebook even busts people in private groups for posting images that have been flagged as being unfriendly to…well, in the case I know of, Islam.  You have to ask: why is the left so in love with Islam?  Do they think that Mohammad was a prophet?  No, it’s because Islam is proving to be a potent wrecking ball against civilizations that are not communist, and thus, need to be torn down, in the eyes of Silicon Valley’s critical theory Communist freaks.


I just realized something…

Mark Zuckerberg was born in 1984.


Update 2019-08-26

Here’s an article that needed to be part of this…

https://www.fastcompany.com/90394048/uh-oh-silicon-valley-is-building-a-chinese-style-social-credit-system

What they talk about already being manifested outside of China is probably the tip of the iceberg.  They will take this to the level of Chinese communist dystopia and beyond if not stopped.

Have you heard about China’s social credit system? It’s a technology-enabled, surveillance-based nationwide program designed to nudge citizens toward better behavior. The ultimate goal is to “allow the trustworthy to roam everywhere under heaven while making it hard for the discredited to take a single step,” according to the Chinese government.

In place since 2014, the social credit system is a work in progress that could evolve by next year into a single, nationwide point system for all Chinese citizens, akin to a financial credit score. It aims to punish for transgressions that can include membership in or support for the Falun Gong or Tibetan Buddhism, failure to pay debts, excessive video gaming, criticizing the government, late payments, failing to sweep the sidewalk in front of your store or house, smoking or playing loud music on trains, jaywalking, and other actions deemed illegal or unacceptable by the Chinese government.

It can also award points for charitable donations or even taking one’s own parents to the doctor.

Punishments can be harsh, including bans on leaving the country, using public transportation, checking into hotels, hiring for high-visibility jobs, or acceptance of children to private schools. It can also result in slower internet connections and social stigmatization in the form of registration on a public blacklist.

China’s social credit system has been characterized in one pithy tweet as “authoritarianism, gamified.”

At present, some parts of the social credit system are in force nationwide and others are local and limited (there are 40 or so pilot projects operated by local governments and at least six run by tech giants like Alibaba and Tencent).

Beijing maintains two nationwide lists, called the blacklist and the red list—the former consisting of people who have transgressed, and the latter people who have stayed out of trouble (a “red list” is the Communist version of a white list.) These lists are publicly searchable on a government website called China Credit.

The Chinese government also shares lists with technology platforms. So, for example, if someone criticizes the government on Weibo, their kids might be ineligible for acceptance to an elite school.

Public shaming is also part of China’s social credit system. Pictures of blacklisted people in one city were shown between videos on TikTok in a trial, and the addresses of blacklisted citizens were shown on a map on WeChat.

Some Western press reports imply that the Chinese populace is suffocating in a nationwide Skinner box of oppressive behavioral modification. But some Chinese are unaware that it even exists. And many others actually like the idea. One survey found that 80% of Chinese citizens surveyed either somewhat or strongly approve of social credit system.

IT CAN HAPPEN HERE

Many Westerners are disturbed by what they read about China’s social credit system. But such systems, it turns out, are not unique to China. A parallel system is developing in the United States, in part as the result of Silicon Valley and technology-industry user policies, and in part by surveillance of social media activity by private companies.

Here are some of the elements of America’s growing social credit system.

INSURANCE COMPANIES

The New York State Department of Financial Services announced earlier this year that life insurance companies can base premiums on what they find in your social media posts. That Instagram pic showing you teasing a grizzly bear at Yellowstone with a martini in one hand, a bucket of cheese fries in the other, and a cigarette in your mouth, could cost you. On the other hand, a Facebook post showing you doing yoga might save you money. (Insurance companies have to demonstrate that social media evidence points to risk, and not be based on discrimination of any kind—they can’t use social posts to alter premiums based on race or disability, for example.)

The use of social media is an extension of the lifestyle questions typically asked when applying for life insurance, such as questions about whether you engage in rock climbing or other adventure sports. Saying “no,” but then posting pictures of yourself free-soloing El Capitan, could count as a “yes.”

PATRONSCAN

A company called PatronScan sells three products—kiosk, desktop, and handheld systems—designed to help bar and restaurant owners manage customers. PatronScan is a subsidiary of the Canadian software company Servall Biometrics, and its products are now on sale in the United States, Canada, Australia, and the United Kingdom.

PatronScan helps spot fake IDs—and troublemakers. When customers arrive at a PatronScan-using bar, their ID is scanned. The company maintains a list of objectionable customers designed to protect venues from people previously removed for “fighting, sexual assault, drugs, theft, and other bad behavior,” according to its website. A “public” list is shared among all PatronScan customers. So someone who’s banned by one bar in the U.S. is potentially banned by all the bars in the U.S., the U.K., and Canada that use the PatronScan system for up to a year. (PatronScan Australia keeps a separate system.)

Judgment about what kind of behavior qualifies for inclusion on a PatronScan list is up to the bar owners and managers. Individual bar owners can ignore the ban, if they like. Data on non-offending customers is deleted in 90 days or less. Also: PatronScan enables bars to keep a “private” list that is not shared with other bars, but on which bad customers can be kept for up to five years.

PatronScan does have an “appeals” process, but it’s up to the company to grant or deny those appeals.

UBER AND AIRBNB

Thanks to the sharing economy, the options for travel have been extended far beyond taxis and hotels. Uber and Airbnb are leaders in providing transportation and accommodation for travelers. But there are many similar ride-sharing and peer-to-peer accommodations companies providing similar services.

Airbnb—a major provider of travel accommodation and tourist activities—bragged in March that it now has more than 6 million listings in its system. That’s why a ban from Airbnb can limit travel options.

Airbnb can disable your account for life for any reason it chooses, and it reserves the right to not tell you the reason. The company’s canned message includes the assertion that “This decision is irreversible and will affect any duplicated or future accounts. Please understand that we are not obligated to provide an explanation for the action taken against your account.” The ban can be based on something the host privately tells Airbnb about something they believe you did while staying at their property. Airbnb’s competitors have similar policies.

It’s now easy to get banned by Uber, too. Whenever you get out of the car after an Uber ride, the app invites you to rate the driver. What many passengers don’t know is that the driver now also gets an invitation to rate you. Under a new policy announced in May: If your average rating is “significantly below average,” Uber will ban you from the service.

WHATSAPP

You can be banned from communications apps, too. For example, you can be banned on WhatsApp if too many other users block you. You can also get banned for sending spam, threatening messages, trying to hack or reverse-engineer the WhatsApp app, or using the service with an unauthorized app.

WhatsApp is small potatoes in the United States. But in much of the world, it’s the main form of electronic communication. Not being allowed to use WhatsApp in some countries is as punishing as not being allowed to use the telephone system in America.

WHAT’S WRONG WITH SOCIAL CREDIT, ANYWAY?

Nobody likes antisocial, violent, rude, unhealthy, reckless, selfish, or deadbeat behavior. What’s wrong with using new technology to encourage everyone to behave?

The most disturbing attribute of a social credit system is not that it’s invasive, but that it’s extralegal. Crimes are punished outside the legal system, which means no presumption of innocence, no legal representation, no judge, no jury, and often no appeal. In other words, it’s an alternative legal system where the accused have fewer rights.

Social credit systems are an end-run around the pesky complications of the legal system. Unlike China’s government policy, the social credit system emerging in the U.S. is enforced by private companies. If the public objects to how these laws are enforced, it can’t elect new rule-makers.

An increasing number of societal “privileges” related to transportation, accommodations, communications, and the rates we pay for services (like insurance) are either controlled by technology companies or affected by how we use technology services. And Silicon Valley’s rules for being allowed to use their services are getting stricter.

If current trends hold, it’s possible that in the future a majority of misdemeanors and even some felonies will be punished not by Washington, D.C., but by Silicon Valley. It’s a slippery slope away from democracy and toward corporatocracy.

In other words, in the future, law enforcement may be determined less by the Constitution and legal code, and more by end-user license agreements.

Now let’s see: what is big tech most known for these days, in terms of activism?

Ah, I know!  Politics!

So get ready to be punished for “wrong-think”, as decided by Silicon Valley high-level and low-level serpents alike, who are online activists in cubicles by day and transsexual antifas by night.