Apparently, the lives of MGTOW and incel men still don’t matter, as much as at any point in history.
This statement was made by an Oregon state senator, in response to the current crisis – the Democrats trying to get an economically suicidal cap-and-trade bill passed, with the Republicans walking out after negotiations broke down (there were actual negotiations with a Commiecrat super-majority?) and denying the Democrats a quorum, which prompted the Oregon governor (a typical blue-state switch-hitter) to send the Oregon State Police to arrest them and bring them back. Now they’re shutting the Senate down due to a “possible militia threat” from right-wing groups (which is just the Democrats playing drama queen victims – tomorrow you’ll see some gay couples burning their own houses down and claiming it was the Bundy family). In this situation, contrary to the Dems’ claims that Republicans have decided to “turn their back on their constituents who they are honor-bound to represent here in this building,” they’re doing exactly what their constituents want them to do, by stopping the bill any way they can – in this case, by not being in the building.
Anyway, there’s the back story – now let’s get to what’s important to us.
One Republican senator named Brian Boquist said, “Send bachelors and come heavily armed … I’m not going to be a political prisoner in the state of Oregon. It’s just that simple.” Good on him! Well, except for the part about the bachelors.
What he’s saying is a reference to the age-old policy of favoritism for married men over bachelors. Some may say that he’s not serious, but on some level, he probably is. A look at his bio shows that he himself is married, and customarily speaking, if imply that a particular demographic is basically cannon fodder, and you’re not in that demographic yourself, then that means you probably mean it. Now if this were the Mormon state of Utah, where bachelors above the age of 27 are considered a “menace to society”, he probably would have said, send bachelors and bring us arms – we’ll have target practice!
Ah, isn’t it interesting? Look at how many demographics are getting their day of recognition and respect in the 21st century… Females, racial minorities, Muslims, sexual deviants, so-called refugees, homeless people… We’re all supposed to drop everything and apologize to them for being better of than they are, or apologize for what someone who looked like us in one way or another did to someone who looked like them, decades or centuries ago. But have you noticed that one group still isn’t getting respect from anyone? Men without women. Whether by choice or by circumstance, there have always been and will always be a certain number of men who will fly solo. They’ve always been frowned upon, not because they are a burden on society or some kind of nuisance, but for the same reason that weaker, isolated animals (and especially human children) are attacked by stronger, more popular and more established members of their own species: it’s the natural behavior found in a tournament species, and in humanity, it becomes a predator-prey paradigm. You might have been able to chalk all forms of bigoted oppression up to the same phenomenon, but for some reason, in spite of all the “progress” that humanity makes as it becomes so “enlightened” or whatever, single men are still excluded from humanity’s reforms against that kind of jungle rule…
Ironic isn’t it? Still a the back of the line, with women, and in broader society.
You’ll notice that when it comes to such reforms, a given demographic will only get an edge in the game of identity/grievance politics when they have enough numbers to matter, but even as incel’s and MGTOW’s numbers increase well into the millions, they still aren’t getting traction. Is it because they’re not playing the identity politics game, or is it because the purveyors of identity politics (liberals and socialists) have no utility for single men, owing to their inherent ruggedness and independence? As with all things, I guess we’ll find out. Or we won’t.
In the mean time, I don’t need to tell anyone, of those who would read this blog, that humanity is no closer to accepting MGTOW or incel men than they ever were. Hostility toward unattached men is on an upward trajectory, and guys like Elliot Rodger, who make examples of themselves, are not helping matters…yet matters are cultivating those kinds of rouges. It’s a vicious cycle, and unless you have a female to mate with, you’re caught right in the middle of it.
I guess that’s one thing that female validation is still good for… Is it worth it?