Author: boydoesntmeetgirl

Trans-Fascism, Gaslighting and the Solomon Asch Conformity Awards

The Asch conformity experiments of the 1950s demonstrated that peer pressure, ridicule and ostracism are powerful enough forces to make people conform to the group, even contrary to their own cognition.  Today’s transgender movement, which has turned into a kind of fascism (no, that’s not a right-leaning ideology at all) puts the lessons of those experiments into practice – the dissenting subject is singled out and demonized.  Some will crack under the pressure, and some won’t.

Nothing exemplifies this as well as Ben Shapiro’s exchanges on a panel discussion with Dr. Drew a few years ago.  It started as a conversation about “Caitlyn” Jenner winning the Arthur Ashe Courage Award

…and then, these virtue-signaling trans-fascist zombies started competing for what we could call the Solomon Asch Conformity Award.  Everyone in there was against him, including Dr. Drew, who is acting as the moderate voice of reason and authority in that forum – It’s the classic good-cop-bad-cop conditioning.

But who was being conditioned?  Certainly not Ben Shapiro – they know he’s a lost cause.  No, it is the viewers who are being conditioned into thinking that this demonstration of pack mentality, and punishment for wrong-think, is normal and how things ought to be.  It’s not just letting mental illness out of the institution, but giving it a gun and a badge as well.  Trans-fascists flush out anything less than total acceptance of and participation in transgender delusion, and conflate it with with gay bashing and bigotry of all kinds (intersectionality).  They want there to be no middle ground where anyone can hide – either you sign their dotted line of trans-validation, or you’ll be on the run like a fugitive.

Do not be deceived.  We outnumber these brainwashed assholes.  And we have basic logic and facts on our side.

One of main ways that they’re bringing this fight to your front door is through pronouns: either you kiss the ring of trans-fascism and call a man, who thinks he’s a woman, she, or you’ll be unmasked by the social justice squad as a one of those irredeemable deplorables who must be stopped.  Shapiro’s stance on transgenderism at large is libertarian (surprising, considering that he’s a neocon) in that he is fine with addressing someone by a name that they changed to, or letting people do whatever freakish things they want with their own body, but compelling others to use the biologically incorrect pronoun is forcing society to validate it.  The good news is that, if the goal of trans-fascists is to give the naysayers no way out, someone in their ranks blew it for them, by their acceptance of the pronoun they as an alternative.  I’ve held for a long time that this pronoun was the acceptable compromise because it’s correct, but doesn’t force me to divine something that is not consonant with basic biology.  If use of they becomes mainstream, it’s going to be awkward to use, but the trans-fascists who are intent on antagonizing dissenters will find that they’ve painted themselves into a corner with it, and missed the spot they were going for.

Another way they have weaponized the lexicon is gender vs. sex, the former being redefined as a social construct, and the latter being designated as the term to use in place of the former.  Well, what can we say?  They hijacked other previously innocuous terms, e.g. gay, which use to mean happy, lesbian, which used to be a demonym for people from the Greek island of Lesbos, and confirmed bachelor, which use to apply to most people who read this blog…so why not hijack more of the lexicon?  It’s easy to get blindsided the first time you hear a SJW, fresh out of the college gender-chaos centrifuge, spit this idea out at you.  It sounds so novel and unheard of, yet they speak with such authority about it (remind me to do a blog on false/bluff authority), that you may find yourself looking the terms up, just to make sure that you aren’t the crazy or ignorant one…  Yep, sorry to say it, but you’ve just been gaslit.

This video is required viewing – Steven Crowder hosts a debate between a transsexual/transvestite/idunno guy, and a politically conservative lesbian, who calls the trans-fascist movement out for exactly what they are doing: gaslighting.  They try to make you feel like you are the crazy one, the backwards one, the bigot and the fascist – they’ll call you all of that and worse.

They start talking about that part of it about halfway through the video.

On a side note…yes, I noticed – she’s still a woman, and doesn’t want to give up her entitlements in spite of all of her perks…but she’s absolutely right on this one, so we’ll let it go this time.

Live and let live?  Of course.  MGTOW and incels have to live by this principle – their safety and peace depend on it.  Transgenderism would not be an issue worth talking about if it followed that creed as well, but that is not what’s happening here.  Transgenderism is on the offense, not defense.  It has turned into an in-your-face, fascist movement (one of many in our day) and the way you fight it is by recognizing their tactics.

Always remember the Asch Conformity Experiments, when the issues of transgenderism and trans-acceptance come up.  Make that your starting point, and don’t fall prey to the gaslighting.  Your sanity and your soul depend on it.

Advertisements

How To Avoid Female Entanglement

Perhaps the most central theme in my post urging less talk and more action in MGTOW was about avoiding entanglement with women.  These days, the discord between genders is shifting into high gear, with #MeToo and #TimesUp ramping up, and #MGTOW also ramping up in kind – things are getting worse, not better.  Men everywhere see the future of interaction with females more like a minefield than ever before, and those who are aware of the movement realize that MGTOW are going to be the best equipped of all men, when it comes to the bare minimum of interactions with women in the modern age.

A lot of advice is being doled out, but the quality of that advice varies.  From what I’ve seen, just by poking around the net, much of the legal advice on how to deal with a divorce is good – much of this comes from experience and legal expertise.  But that is when you are already in the middle of a war, and some guys are not entangled, and are just cutting their teeth in the MGTOW way.  It seems that most of the advice they get, that isn’t about lifestyle (i.e. finance, exercise and health, sex dolls, etc.) but about how to deal with women, is either overly convoluted or comes pretty much out of the pages of PUA.

I don’t think it has to be complicated at all.  As long you can limit your interaction with females to a point below what can be considered entanglement, then there really isn’t a lot you have to do; the key is in understanding what entanglement really is, and how the most innocuous-seeming brushes with females are probably ultra-virus vectors of entanglement.  Remember that women are like caves, in more ways than one: the further you go in, the farther you’ll have to climb back out.

So, here are my own strategies for how to keep female contamination out of your life and, as necessary, get them out of your life…

  1. Don’t acquire female “friends”.  They’re probably not really your friends anyway, as you think they are.  More accurately, you are just one of their many orbiters, and if they never hear from you again, they probably won’t even notice.  If the friendship is not as shallow as that, then likely it means they are getting utility from you – it doesn’t really go the other way, with utility flowing from her to you.  Either way, the point is that females don’t make good “friends” in that sense, so it’s like cigarettes – be smart, don’t start.
  2. Taper off slowly.  If it’s too late and you have female friends, there is no sense in being mean and telling them to get lost, nor do you want to suddenly ghost them because they might try to find you and see if you died or something.  The best way is to make yourself more and more rare: pick up the phone less, make your responses to their messages shorter and shorter, and just become more of a stranger generally.  Women aren’t telepathic like they think they are, but they are good enough readers to get the message, and it won’t likely be too big of a deal for them anyhow.
  3. Don’t make eye contact.  From day to day, you end up dealing with females in one capacity or another – the bank teller, the cashier, etc. – and the majority of them are short exchanges.  Of all the strategies you can employ to try and preclude them from taking interest in you or trying to chat you up, you’d be surprised at how effective it is to simply avoid eye contact with them.  It’s not that hard, really – just keep from looking at their face.  It doesn’t take long before this becomes second nature.
  4. Minimal words and expediency.  For longer and more involved exchanges, such as job interviews, meetings and things that take at least a few minutes, not making eye contact is not really going to work.  In these situations, the less you say, the better.  Don’t elaborate on things, tell personal stories, or make it any easier for them to really get to know you.  It’s not a matter of acting cold or giving them the impression that you explicitly dislike them (that increases your risk of being accused of something) but more of a strictly-business approach.  Draw the meeting to a close as soon as possible and get out…unless you’re trapped on an elevator (see #10 if this happens).
  5. Personal questions?  Spit them back.  You can tell when a woman is data mining you, in order to figure out what you’re about and what she can do with you.  One of the most important yet difficult things to do is to nip this inquisition in the bud, but there are ways, hopefully without damage control.  This is an area where you need to have at least a few responses pre-loaded.  For example, if she asks you what you do in your spare time, make sure you know something dorky (see #10) that won’t lead anyone to invite you to anything (see #11).  Some questions are personal enough that you can throw up the red flag: she asked if you have a girlfriend, and you can shoot her a sideways look and say, “Uh-oh, here come those questions,” as a semi-polite way of saying don’t even go there.  The idea is to put them on defense for having asked something like that.  The last thing you want to do is act like a simpering little boy and tell her the truth while blushing – you do that, and the next thing you know, she’ll be asking if you’ve ever had one…then what are you going to do?  By that time, she already knows the answer and she’s just skewering you.  (This is probably a point that needs its own blog post, so stay tuned…)
  6. Do not make any jokes, do not laugh.  Even when you see a golden opportunity, you have to resist the urge to tickle her funny bone.  This one is going to be harder for guys who have a sense of humor.  Laughing at something, beyond the one “heh” acknowledgement laugh (signaling that you got it, whatever it is) is also a bad idea because all of this may inadvertently act as social grease that gets the wheels turning – wheels that you, the MGHOW, don’t want to turn.  Anyways, chances are that your jokes are terrible and you laugh like a dork, but some females will humor you anyway, which might be a signal that you’re headed for bad places.
  7. Never, ever give your contact information.  This should be an obvious one, but it’s surprising how even seasoned veterans will make this error, so it needs to be said anyway – don’t give them your phone number, e-mail or link up with them on social media.  First of all, you don’t want to establish a line of communication that you’ll need to break off (strategy #2) and you don’t want them to have a vector through which they can engage with you.  If it’s a professional associate of some kind who needs your contact info for whatever reason, it’s safer to give it to them because you can compartmentalize that relationship off to the professional arena, and you have an alibi for to entertaining only those communications that are strictly work-related.
  8. Don’t chat them up, even in anonymity.  As I’ve said before, guys who think that mingling like this is harmless, and that they’ve got it all under control, are like the guys who say that they can drive drunk.  There is a certain kind of energy that you get from talking to a female, especially when it’s a rarity – I’m sure that your brain is giving you all kinds of rewards for doing it, in the form of dopamine and other neurotransmitters.  Females know this, and they know that your defenses are being lowered; as this happens, all of the other strategies above become less likely to be remembered and employed.  Even if nothing does come of it, there are other drawbacks to it: a). You are not training yourself for the full embrace of MGTOW – to put it another way, you can’t wean a calf and let it suck.  b). You are only helping to inflate the female attention-whoring hive mind’s ego even further.  When you go into a chatroom or message board, and you see three or four thirsty cucks shamelessly begging a female user for sex that will never happen – even with no flattering picture – it’s just making her even more deluded about her own sexual market value, and depending on how dirty the guys are talking, she’s getting more #MeToo ammo.  For this reason, you should avoid having conversations with them on the internet.  Even on a blog like this, don’t get into a discussion, a debate or anything with a female – just don’t even go there.  Don’t respond to their messages, and delete them if you can.  If you’re running the blog, remove them from your followers list if possible.
  9. Avoid social media altogether.  #8 above isn’t a problem if you don’t go there in the first place.  This includes Facebook, et al, but also forums and chat rooms.  There is a myriad of reasons why social media is bad for your brain, but it’s even worse if you’re MGTOW – it’s antithetical to that lifestyle.  Besides, it’s bad enough with the relentless porn spam bots that are dressed up to look like a woman’s profile, and message you with something like, “Hey!  You look familiar…did we go to high school together???  Hey, check out my nude pics for $9.95!”
  10. Say horribly stupid things.  When all else fails, and you can see that a female is trying to worm her way in (not because she is genuinely attracted to you, but because she wants you in her orbit so that she can get the benefits of your attention, adoration and perhaps even resources without you getting anything real in return) you should be able to ward her off by doing or saying things that signal to her that you are low-status.  Here’s how you do it…  If you laugh like a dork, try to laugh even dorkier.  Make jokes that are intentionally stupid and make you look infantile.  Mention that you make minimum wage (even if you don’t).  Brag about drinking milk, playing video games and not having a driver’s license.  Tell her that you have no criminal record, tattoos or cigarettes (make sure she’s not a church girl before you start doing that).  If you have to, start talking weird, but not in a way that’s going to get you accused of something or beaten by a white knight or bad boy nearby, e.g. tell her that you’re a brony, or something else that is going to be like pouring ice water into her vagina. What you say is going to depend on the situation, but it shouldn’t take too many of these lines to get her to back away slowly.
  11. Stay indoors.  Don’t go to obvious places like bars, clubs or parties, but also avoid social outings where there is an increased likelihood of crossing paths with females you don’t already know, or aren’t related to [cue banjo].  You can’t always do this, but you can minimize your exposure to risk by opting out when you can.  Avoid weddings like the plague, or make only a cameo appearance and get out as fast as possible.

 

As you do these things, it’s important to avoid pissing her off, as much as possible.  Women are irrational when they get angry, and now they have more power at their fingertips than ever.  Unless you live on an island, you are only going to be able to lay so low, but that’s certainly no reason to make yourself more conspicuous than you have to.  No approach is perfect and there are no guarantees, but you can better your odds if you avoid getting in the croshairs of women’s bullshit, their games and their anger.

And always remember…  It’s not your fault that things are this way.  None of this was your idea, and your not going to make things better by letting women use you to make things worse.

Don’t Try To Explain It To Women

This video is a textbook example of how women are never, ever going to understand MGTOW.  This video is like fingernails on a chalkboard – a full hen house of women and cucks, all weighing in on something they proudly do not understand, being squawked at you through the same annoying voice.

Get gets all the way through it, has it explained to her, and still can’t make sense out of it.  And of course, condemns it.

Seems that most women who try to critically analyze MGTOW do so from a standpoint of being flabbergasted and offended by the concept.  Even when people give them answers, the get spat right back.

Don’t we all find ourselves trying to explain this to women, and it’s it always futile?  If there should be any shaming going on, it should be MGTOW men shaming each other for continuing in trying to get through to females or tradcon cucks.

Iceland Institutes Gender Communism

http://www.mirror.co.uk/money/iceland-just-made-illegal-pay-11789693

This article is a few days old, but surprisingly, I don’t see anyone else covering it.

What it basically says is that companies must get a certificate showing that they are paying men and women equally, after they “evaluate every job that’s being done” and report it to the government.  The law was passed last year and just went into effect.

Like any social leveling scheme, it doesn’t level the playing field, but levels the scoreboard.  It’s based on the incorrect assumption that you can gauge equality of opportunity by equality of results – as if all demographics are equally talented, motivated and capable, and every disparity between their levels of overall success can be explained by discrimination.  They assume that discrimination/bias is the only variable that affects success and income.  It’s false of course, but in countries like Iceland (and just about everywhere else anymore) people don’t understand that, nor will they ever.

Iceland, which has a population of around 323,000 people, has been ranked the best in the world for gender equality by the World Economic Forum for nine years in a row.

That means that you don’t want to move to Iceland.  Every western world country is like this to different degrees, but the last place you want to be is on the cutting edge of the insanity.  If anyone makes it out of the coal mine shaft alive, it won’t be the canary – don’t be the canary.

 

“Time’s Up” – The Next Phase of Sexual McCarthyism

Just as you may have guessed, they’re expanding the scope of the #MeToo in every conceivable direction, like hydraulic fluid under pressure.  It’s what we could have predicted: millions of Hollywood dollars behind a campaign that puts all men at risk – oh, sorry, I mean all but the ones whose asses are covered by tax dollars, that is.  Actually, I predict that the finger pointing at politicians is going to be winding down now (until just before the midterms this November) because the plan to gain moral high ground by throwing their own overboard, i.e. Al Franken, is already faltering, so they’ll put all their hopes in regaining the House and going after Trump that way.  But anyhow…

This new movement, known as Time’s Up, would actually be kind of funny, if it was a sign that Hollywood was actually planning on eating itself – especially during the doldrums of the movie business.  Sorry, no such luck.  This is aimed at taking sexual McCarthyism to every corner of society, right down to farm hands, providing a means to underwrite false accusations for blue-collar women against blue-collar men.  Of course they’ve also managed to dovetail in other social justice items on the feminism agenda, like gender parity, grievance resourcing for racial minorities and LGBTQ-?? (gender chaos groups), an end to due process for accused men, and even breaching of non-disclosure agreements (NDA).

There will probably be more gynocentric causes piled onto it until it becomes an incoherent cornucopia of left-fascist causes, just about like Occupy.  In fact, that’s probably what we should hope for, because it will become so unfocused and ballistic as to become a left ideological farce, just like Occupy soon did.  Movements are always more potent when they have clear focus and a relatively narrow cause – the wedge needs a thin edge, does it not?  This is something that the movers and shakers have forgotten over the years, and it shows.  At a time in history when they barely have the means to get anything they want – the era of the Trump/Brexit populist renaissance – they start demanding everything they can think of, and they get nothing.

For this reason, I think that the barometer of how much we should worry about Time’s Up, #MeToo or whatever else they are going to cook up is in how broad in scope it is.  Right now, I’d say we are pretty safe – true, there will be some male casualties, but $13 million so far isn’t very much.  If they narrow their scope and get a more efficient and specialized machine of finger-pointing firepower up and running – the kind that is palatable enough for pussy-whipped cuckservatives to sign onto – then you can start to worry.

Woman Given Tranny To Do Her Pap Smear

gender-two-1

UK NHS Patient Asks for Female Nurse for Cervical Smear, Gets Tattooed Trans Man With Stubble

There is only so far you can go down the whole gender-chaos rabbit hole before you run into the bedrock of reality.  Biological women demanding to be recognized as men, and biological men demanding to be recognized as women, and all wanting to get everything that comes with that recognition…what could possibly go wrong?  Mix in political forces, and you have true tyranny.

Tranny.  Tyranny.

Maybe that can be the 54th “gender” – they tyrant-sexual, who seeks to make its mental illness into a problem for others.

This video is worth watching – an offended lesbian calls transsexual activists out for precisely what they do: gaslight.  They try to make you think that you are the crazy one, when in fact, they are the whack-jobs.

Simple Carbohydrates of Cyberspace: Men Have Porn, Women Have Social Media

You see it everywhere – in blogs, forums, chatrooms and especially on Facebook, et al.  It’s always the same story, where a “queen bee” will grace internet spaces with their presence, and pathetic, thirsty cucks with no self-respect are tripping over themselves to get a morsel of her attention.  You see guys asking every (apparent) female who comes into a scene in cyberspace for sex – which there is no even remotely logical reason to think is a possibility – not even for the purpose of entertaining themselves or others, or to get a rise out of the (apparent) female, but out of sheer reptilian brain drive.  A man’s reptilian brain is able to get away with putting a sign up saying  >>>thirsty loser here<<<  because the internet has a way of making some people’s cerebral cortex fall asleep at the switch, for some reason.  In short, it’s habit and it’s compulsion, and it needs to stop.

But why?  It’s pretty harmless, isn’t it?  No, it’s not harmless.

Feminists might agree with that last assertion on its face, arguing that it’s sexual harassment, puts women everywhere at risk of rape, causes them to be paid less in the workforce, or whatever other hyperbole they can dream up – the most ridiculous notion would be that it harms women’s self-esteem.  Of course, that’s not what I contend.  The real harm done by over-inflating a woman’s self-esteem, to dangerous levels.

Just imagine what it would be like to walk into a room, and have everyone suddenly exalt you as being high sexual market value, and grovel for your attention.  Imagine if you logged into a chat room, with an avatar of your own picture, and people from around the world started begging your for sex.  What would that do for your self-esteem?  Would it make you humble?  Or, would it make you feel like you are the one in control of things?  Many will rightly point out that kissing women’s asses has been a big problem for ages, and we can see that it has gone right to their heads, as most of them act as though they’re royalty.  Of course, feminism has made this problem exponentially worse, but the internet has taking it to a higher level still.

Welcome to the epidemic of female attention-whoring on the internet.  Men have porn, women have social media.

Just like men have limitless dick-rubbing material with the click of a mouse, women have limitless ego-rubbing material with just as much ease.  They don’t have to leave their houses, they don’t have to mess around with one interaction at a time, they don’t have to put up with the burden of allowing guys to buy them drinks.  They put up a profile pic, and they get showered with what amounts to fan mail from guys everywhere.  The truly become celebrities in their own way, so it shouldn’t be a surprise that they have the egos to match.

The internet hasn’t made it easier for women only.  Men also benefit from the efficiency of trying to break the ice on the internet, because a). they don’t have to leave the house either; b). they don’t have to spend hard cash on drinks; and c). it’s less risky online.  Yes, the social (and even legal) risks of trying to engage with women in real life make the internet approach much more practical, albeit futile.  Why is it futile?  Because they have just entered what amounts to a virtual pool of applicants, all competing for one job opening – one that the employer might not even bother filling it, because they love the piles of applications coming in; truth be told, it’s probably already filled in most cases, but that doesn’t stop the desperate from applying.

So what can explain why internet dating sites/apps in particular are a sausage fest?  After all, don’t women crave male attention and worship as much as men crave sex?  Probably not, but it wouldn’t matter even if they did.  If there’s one dynamic that hasn’t change in the modern age, it’s that men still have to do the pursuing.  It’s not a conspiracy of gender politics or feminism driving that (although it does make feminist hypocrisy stick out like a sore thumb) – it’s the basic concept of supply and demand.  Feminism may have exacerbated the problem, by apparently bringing women’s psychological demand lower than their inherent biological demand, but the point is that it has always been that way to whatever degree – the onus is on men to break the ice, and that will never change.*  Now, when you consider that women get attention from every direction on the internet, not just in places like Tinder, et al, it’s easy to understand what’s happening: women are getting their attention-whoring needs met everywhere they go online – be it Facebook, Twitter, Youtube or any place where they can be identified as female – so there is less need to go onto a dating site where they are going to get more of the same.  On top of that, there is going to be more quantity than quality in explicit dating arenas – that is, more cliché hook-up begging and less unsolicited spontaneity.

Naturally, this is all going to get worse before it gets better (if it ever gets better).  As the vicious cycle continues, and a greater number of men are becoming thirstier and thirstier, while women tend to narrow their focus to a shrinking proportion of hyper-alphas…it’s not going to be pretty.  About all you can do is rebuke your fellow loser for his behavior, and try to shake some sense into him, for the sake of manhood at least.  Men who grovel and pussy-beg, particularly in places where there is no chance of it turning into something, need to be corrected and made to see the error of their ways.  This is something where each one of us can make even a small difference.  Even if you don’t convince some idiot on the spot, at least you’ll get him to think – you’ll plant seed.  You might even get one or two females to think about their own attention-whoring, though this is much less likely.  Whatever the case, there is no point in remaining silent, now that you know the truth.


 

*It’s worth pointing out that for attractive men, “breaking the ice” is more or less a formality, because she will make it easy for him.  She will give him indicators of interest (IOI) which are a green light for him to jump on her, so he’s not really risking rejection.  On the internet, there is no way to give an IOI (hence the Tinder protocol) but the risk is smaller (and the rewards non-existent).

Why Sex = Love To The Untouchables

What makes a man hate women?  He may not hate them, but what he says gets interpreted as hateful.

Why would he say things about women that anyone would interpret as hateful?  Because women have proven that they don’t love him, so he has nothing to lose by speaking candidly about them.

Where did he get the idea that women don’t love him?  Simply put, no women are sexual with him.

Why does he think that a woman has to prove her love through sex?  He probably never did think that; but the fact that she is sexual with other men is proof of who she loves, and more poignantly, who she doesn’t love.  She didn’t have to prove anything with sex, but she did anyway, and of her own volition.

What made him think that sex and love are mutually-inclusive?  Because he was taught that they were.  He was taught that it was wrong to use someone for sex whom you didn’t really love.  He chose to live by that standard, and and thought women would live by it too.

Why did he assume that women were also going to live by that standard?  Because he assumed that women and men, being equal, are held to the same standards.

Where did he get the idea that men and women are equal?

Yes, where did he get that idea…

 

The $300,000 First Date

http://www.gazettextra.com/entertainment/police-woman-ruined-k-worth-of-art-on-date-with/article_b9c7457e-0ca3-5a3f-acda-431956c3e788.html

Read this article, and take note of the behavior of this drunken 29-year-old tornado that tears through this guy’s house.  Usually women don’t start throwing massive tantrums and destroying property like that until the guy is a little more entangled with the woman than than a first date (when they are married, all bets are off)…but it’s a teachable moment about just what entanglement really is.  At the very least, it’s a lesson that you don’t take a drunken woman (no, drunkenness doesn’t account for all this – don’t take a woman period whom you don’t know better than that) anywhere near valuable assets that can be damaged.  A woman can be a loose cannon.

Clearly, her plan was to dig for his gold, and when it was looking obvious that he wasn’t going to be her sugar daddy, she retaliated.  She hid in his house like a child and then went on a rampage.  Again, it wasn’t alcohol doing this, it was childishness, and confidence that there would be no consequences for her actions, inasmuch as she is a woman.  That confidence may not be all that unfounded, actually, especially if she gets a woman judge.  We’ll have to see how this story shakes out.  Personally, I predict that she gets a slap on the wrist.  Remember, we are in the age of #MeToo, where a mere disparity in wealth and power between the man and the woman factors into the outcome more than ever.

I am tempted to say that this might have been political as well, but no, I doubt that – female childishness can easily account for this.  I think this is just what it appears to be.

 

 

Nice Guys/Betas Are Sexual Academics

No, I don’t mean that they work in sex education (last place you should ever find a cuck like that)…I mean that guys who can’t get women, because of their supplication to women, act that way because their ideas about how to treat women were not learned through experience, but taught to them by gynocentrics – all theoretical, no hands-on.  They won’t ever get any hands-on either at that rate, but women themselves sure as hell won’t cry for these men whom they helped screw up.

You could call an “academic” a person who has spent all of their time in a classroom and none of it in the real world.  In the literal sense, as it pertains to career, academics get little respect from those who learned their trade in the school of hard knocks – “college boys” they call them – because the academic often doesn’t fully understand how things function in reality.  Academics often have little respect for the non-degree people who they have to work with, and a contentious situation often develops; yet, if they can get along well enough to stay focused on the goals at hand, between the academic’s book learning and the tradesman’s raw know-how, sometimes they can achieve great things together.

Now in the case of the sexually academic “nice guy”, great things are not going to happen.  He is not working with other guys as a team, but in direct competition with them.  To make matters worse, his ignorance disadvantage is far, far worse: instead of merely not having a well-rounded foundation in the subject at hand, he as actually been given misinformation and brainwashing to make him behave in a way that’s 180° opposite of what actually works with women.  Few men will try to tell him about his folly, and those who do will be met with his smug dismissal – after all, why should he believe them over women themselves?  Surely the advice from the women themselves would be the best, as it’s coming straight from the source, right?

Eventually, life will force the red pill into his mouth, but that usually won’t happen until it’s too late.  He will be too old and too stunted in his sociosexual development to be able to turn things around.

What will be the gene pool result of this?  Well, after a few generations of nice guy genes being rubbed out, we’ll start to see males becoming less obedient to, tolerant of and sympathetic toward females.  These new males will be tougher and less civilized, as males must become to survive childhood without a father figure – after all, the “alpha fucking/beta cucking” child-rearing strategy, whereby females get the alphas to sire children with their superior genes and then the females sucker the thirsty betas into raising that spawn, can only work until the beta genes are all rubbed out.  When it comes to female genes being rubbed out, you’ll see fewer women who raise their sons to be “chivalrous”…all of this assuming that characteristics that give older, feminist females over younger, gullible males are genetic.

The only hope that a young incel has is to be made to realize that he’s headed in the wrong direction…before it’s too late.  Whatever happens to him to disrupt his course, no matter how drastic, can’t be any worse than ending up far from the goal and not enough time to turn back.