What’s the #1 reason that women would try to get at a man who truly keeps to himself? Rejecting her advances. That’s not going to be a problem if you’re incel.
Some may have seen the news that a woman politician (and a Democrat, no less) has been accused of sexual harassment and retaliation against a guy who refused her advances. Of course we all know that this is a one-off, and it won’t lead to a wave of women being accused – what’s good for the goose is not good for the gander, in the eyes of women. This whole #MeToo movement is not going to work unless there is a double-standard, as is the case with all gynocentric and feminist causes and grievances. I just need to say that right of the bat: don’t fool yourself into thinking that the tide is turning.
Oh, but let’s take a minute to revel in the irony…
“In its rush to claim the high ground in our roiling national conversation about harassment, the Democratic Party has implemented a zero tolerance standard,” Ramsey said in a statement Friday. “For me, that means a vindictive, terminated employee’s false allegations are enough for the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee (DCCC) to decide not to support our promising campaign. We are in a national moment where rough justice stands in place of careful analysis, nuance and due process.”
Oh the wisdom…the wisdom of the presumption of innocence – wisdom they have always had access to, but have brushed aside until they needed it themselves. Isn’t that rich?
She denied the allegations to the Star in two interviews over the last two weeks and said the lawsuit is surfacing now for political purposes.
Impossible! Listen and believe – that’s how it works now. Politics have nothing to do with it, just like the timing of the Alabama Senate race had nothing to do with Roy Moore’s accusers coming forward when they did…or the timing of the release of the Billy Bush tape had nothing to do with the 2016 presidential election…
Anyway, all humor aside, why do I start out with that? No so much for the main point of the news story itself, but for a nuance within the story. She retaliated against a guy she worked with for rejecting her own advances…
Before he rejected her advances, Ramsey “repeatedly told me she heard great things from others about my performance,” Funkhouser wrote. “After I rejected her, she told me she now was hearing bad things about my performance and on June 13, 2005, terminated my employment.”
To be honest, he’s lucky that getting fired was the worst that happened to him. There are numerous stories out there of women crying rape, etc. due to her advances being rejected by the man; but if you look at how many of these cases fall apart in court or during the investigation, it’s obvious that they were often impulsive acts of retaliation. They are usually not very well thought out accusations, and frankly, they don’t need to be. It’s very rare that there are any consequences for false rape accusation, so it’s a low-risk thing for a woman to do; and anyway, many people will still believe her story, and chalk the outcome up to a failure of the justice system to get that monstrous guy.
Bottom line: if a woman, who happens to be morally contaminated by feminism, makes advances in your direction, you’re a sitting duck. If you reciprocate, you’re going to walk right into her web, become entangled and eventually eaten like a bug in divorce/criminal court; if you don’t, you’re going to find yourself battling for your freedom in a kangaroo court system that is hopelessly biased against you, as a man. Tough luck, dude.
But wait! What if you’re incel? What if you are an untouchable omega, either a prolonged virgin or a non-virgin via hooker, relegated to junk-bond status omega male?
There is a (mostly) baseless platitude that says that women reject low-status males when they are younger, but will go for them later in life “because they have matured” in their tastes in men. There is some truth to that, in the sense that females aren’t really going for financial resources when they are younger, in part because few males in their own age group have any resources yet to speak of, but mostly because the females are at their highest fertility at that point, and so they want to secure the best (bad boy) genes they can get at that time. When they get older and their fertility goes down, their priorities shift toward resources, and that’s when beta males supposedly have a shot (to raise the bad boy’s kids and be a cuck). Roger Delvin and others have postulated that female sexual market value for females is much higher for females early on, but that the tables turn and males eventually become higher value, going into their 30s and beyond. I agree with the first half of that, but I don’t agree with the charts that show males and females having a crossover point, where males become higher value than females on the sexual market. Realistic observation will tell you that the gap indeed narrows, but they never really reach parity. Still, odds do get better for beta males…as if an opening opportunity to get cucked & gutted out by the same females that rejected him during their best years is any consolation. Many beta males will go for it, nonetheless.
Now as for the omega incel, women will still not touch you with a 10-foot pole. It doesn’t matter how much money you make, what you look like, what kind of car you drive…you will still be invisible to them at best (or should I say, if you’re lucky). Despite what they say about how the women will supposedly come running to you the second you stop trying to pursue them, the real truth is that the second you drop out of whatever scene you vainly searching for inroads within, womankind will effectively cease to exist. “Normal” men would never believe that it’s possible for a guy to live in a major city for literally years without ever even meeting a woman, but that’s because they fall over backwards into into opportunities with women – never believe the “nothing ventured, nothing gained” lie.
It should now be obvious how this actually protects undesirable men from predatory women: when you take the risk of retaliatory false rape accusation from rejection out of the equation, there really aren’t very many more reasons that a woman is going to accuse you. If you are discreet about your financial prosperity, and you never run for political office, you just might be okay.
Oh, and don’t bother worrying about running for office, if you are an incel…the tradcons won’t vote for any man who doesn’t have a wife and kids, no matter what his politics are.